Security & data exposure
Prompt injection, sensitive-data leakage, instruction bypass, retrieval boundaries, and unauthorized access paths.
YW2 evaluates AI applications, models, agents, and AI-enabled workflows for security, reliability, data exposure, adversarial behavior, bias, operational risk, and governance readiness.
A respected model provider does not eliminate application risk. AI can still leak information, follow malicious instructions, hallucinate, misuse connected tools, or behave differently across languages and user groups.
YW2 tests the deployed system—not just the logo on the model.
Prompt injection, sensitive-data leakage, instruction bypass, retrieval boundaries, and unauthorized access paths.
Whether outputs are consistent, supportable, and fit for the actual business task rather than a generic benchmark.
Whether AI-enabled actions, APIs, internal tools, and automation privileges are appropriately constrained.
Material changes across language, phrasing, geography, demographic context, or other inputs relevant to the use case.
Ownership, human oversight, logging, escalation, acceptable use, evidence, and clearly defined deployment boundaries.
What happens under conflicting, malicious, encoded, indirect, or unexpected instructions and inputs.
The first engagement is intentionally concrete: define the AI system, who uses it, what it is expected to do, and what failure would cost.
YW2 combines functional evaluation with adversarial testing to determine where expected behavior breaks down.
The deliverable is evidence a technical team, security team, executive, or risk owner can actually use.
Model provenance, jurisdiction, hosting location, supply chain, and data-handling practices can be legitimate risk factors. YW2 separates those considerations from measured technical behavior so organizations can make decisions from evidence instead of assumptions.
Start small enough to finish, document the evidence, and use what is learned to decide whether broader governance or continuous evaluation is justified.
Document the system, intended outcome, users, data, integrations, permissions, and operating environment.
Define realistic misuse, failure, security, reliability, and governance scenarios for the use case.
Run repeatable functional and adversarial tests against the highest-priority risks.
Prioritize findings, recommend next actions, and verify critical fixes when requested.
Internal assistants, customer-facing AI, RAG systems, agents, automation, and AI-enabled products that need structured evaluation before wider deployment.
Organizations and contracting teams in the U.S., Taiwan, and other international markets that need stronger documentation around AI security, reliability, governance, or technical evaluation.
YW2 structures this work around measurable technical evidence and clear limits on what an assessment means.
AI assurance is evidence-driven evaluation of an AI-enabled system against defined security, reliability, data, operational, and governance risks before or during deployment.
No. YW2 provides technical evaluation, red teaming, governance-readiness analysis, and documented evidence. Framework mapping does not constitute legal advice, regulatory approval, or accredited certification.
Yes. Where practical, competing models can be evaluated against the same use-case-specific methodology so the decision is based on measured behavior rather than provider reputation alone.